 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
History of Lookout Mountain
Antenna Tower Land
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No Accountability for Health Concerns |
|
|
|
|
|
Rocky Mountain News (5/09/1985) - JeffCo Planner Kevin Nichols is quoted, "...In the
past, there was no
specific plan to handle these things.
We just did them on a case-by-case basis.” Just previous to the adoption
of JeffCo’s Telcom Land Use Plan
(TLUP) on May 8, 1985, KCNC-Channel 4 enlarged their tower to
825-foot with guy wires. TLUP
recommended policies to minimize impacts of visual and noise, residential
interference, health issues, property
values, and recommended alternative locations. TLUP recommends that
antennas must not be at the same
altitude as area residences.
|
|
- 1986 Judge Zimmerman voided a County
Commissioner approval of the Channel 20
tower
on Mt. Morrison because it did not consider the
interference impact.
- September 22-26, 1986. After years of residents
requesting a study of radiation levels from radio
frequencies on Lookout Mountain, an EPA
investigation reported that “the only broadcast
source on Lookout Mountain that operates above
300 MHz is KDVR-TV, Channel 31” which “requires
five times
more power output at the transmitter
site.” This was a warning of future dangerous
levels. But, JeffCo officials have always trusted
industry reports of radiation levels and
industry’s
claim of being within legal limits.
- FCC news report 3/10/87 “FCC releases EPA
Report on radio frequency radiation exposure levels
at Lookout Mountain, CO.” The EPA conducted the
investigation on September 22-26,
1986 directed by
20-year EPA scientist Richard Tell.
Except for high
readings for KYGO (which moved to Squaw Mountain
in 1989), many EPA recorded
1986 “hot spots”
that became out of compliance in 1992 (when
radiation limits became 5 times more stringent)
and were still “hot” in 1998 when Lake Cedar Group
first proposed a Supertower.
- In 1986, the KRMA-TV / KCFR-FM / KUVO-FM
transmitters on residential Colorow Road produced
power densities exceeding the legal limit adopted by
the FCC in 1992 (EPA reported 350 to 425 uW/cm2).
JeffCo approved five new homes and a $2 million
Lookout Mountain Nature Center adjacent to the
tower in the mid 1990s.
|
|
Antenna Mess Built on Cedar Lake Historic Sites |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- The 1986 EPA study recorded KWGN antenna
farm at 50 - 100 uW/cm2 and 273 uW/cm2 on
public Lookout Mountain Road. The Lariat Trail,
Lookout Mountain Park, and Buffalo Bill’s Grave
were listed with the National Register of Historic
Places on May 18, 1990. JeffCo approved expansion
of the KWGN site on November 13, 1991 without
any NEPA compliance.
|
|
"Suit Blames Radio Waves for Cancer"
Denver Post (11/26/1989)
After 15 summers working at the Lighted Lantern square dance camp on Lookout Mountain, Beryl and Maelma
Main purchased the business in 1977. They lived in a cabin adjacent to the KYGO-FM transmitter on a 30-foot
tower every summer for 20 years. Main was diagnosed with non-Hodgkins lymphoma in Feb. 1986. In Sept.
1986, the EPA reported "hot spots" up to 4,400 microwatts per square centimeter caused by KYGO.
|
|
Jefferson Pilot Communications moved the KYGO transmitter
to Squaw Mountain in 1988. The Mains were
examined by
Dr. Robert Becker, a medical professor and author of several
books on the health hazards of
electromagnetic fields. The Post
quotes Becker alleging that the transmitter was the source of
Main’s cancer as
“… a result of prolonged exposure to the
high field strengths of radio-frequency radiation produced
by radio
station KYGO-FM.”
The Post article stated that Denver attorney Bruce DeBoskey
filed the suit in U.S. District Court against Jefferson
Pilot
Communications alleging that “extremely high and
unreasonably dangerous levels of energy from the
"tower”
caused Main’s cancer. DeBoskey is quoted saying “A study of
people living next to radio towers in Honolulu found a
‘significant’ increase in cancer rates compared with rates
among other Honolulu residents living
farther away… Another
study in San Francisco found that, between 1973 and 1985,
children under 15 in the
city’s Noe Valley and Eureka Valley
neighborhoods developed cancer at twice the expected rate
for children in
the Bay Area. The search for the potential
cause centered on the Mount Sutro tower, a massive 977-feet
high with a fork-shaped transmitter at the top-shared
by nine
television stations and four FM radio stations—caused similar
‘hot spots’ at the Lighted Lantern property.” |
Squaw Mountain Facility |
|
The Post article also mentions a Polish study showing twice the incidence of all forms of cancer among soldiers
exposed to RF and microwave radiation between 1971 and 1980. Another source for the article is Louis Slesin,
editor and publisher of Microwave News. Slesin maintained that the industry usually settle such suits “…if
there is any chance of losing at all. That way, no case law is written. The documents are sealed and both
sides agree to keep silent. Then the next plaintiff has to start from scratch.” Slesin supported “a standard of
100 microwatts per square centimeter, one-tenth of the level found at the Lookout Mountain, which was
withdrawn under pressure from the broadcast industry in 1984.” The Main case was settled before a federal
magistrate on February 26, 1990.
- Planning & Zoning 1990 memorandum by Kevin Nichols (1983-1997): “Existing tower operators need
new facilities... It seems like amortization (for removal) would work if the period is reasonable, given the
investment.... Due to the proximity of homes and varied topography, many antennae are on the same
horizontal level as homes. While NIER levels are currently below the ANSI standard used by the FCC and
Jefferson County, there are levels on Lookout Mountain that exceed the limits used by other jurisdictions
such as Multnomah County, Oregon and the State of Massachusetts.”
- A 1991 letter to KRMA-Channel 6 , assistant county attorney Clare Levy (1989-1999) denies a request
to “strengthen the tower” for more antennas. “As you are aware, the Commissioners have directed the
County Attorney’s Office to develop zoning regulations that would require removal of nonconforming
telecommunications towers after a designated grace period.... As part of this regulation, the Board
would also like to prevent nonconforming towers from being strengthened and prevent the size of
antennas and height of towers from being increased.”
|
|
|
 |
Previous |
1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 I 7 I 8 I 9 I 10 I 11 I 12 I 13 I 14 I 15 I 16 I 17 |
Next |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|