Why doesn't Lake Cedar Group's directional antennas result in lower
RF levels for most people?

Several factors combine that would cause RF increases in most neighborhoods surrounding the
proposed Supertower:

The “directional” antenna patterns proposed by Lake Cedar Group are
not
really so directional.

Below is a typical Lake Cedar Group “directional” antenna pattern. The field strength is proportional to the
distance from the center out to the red line in any given direction.


Note that the field strength to the
south and north is even higher
than that to the east, where the
majority of the station’s viewers
are located.

The only area of significantly
reduced radiation is to the west.

Lake Cedar Group "Directional" Antenna Pattern.
   

When this pattern is placed on a map of the area, one can see that the area in the direction of reduced
radiation has few roads and few homes.

Jefferson County’s independent RF expert agreed that many more people would experience RF increases
than would experience decreases from Lake Cedar Group’s proposal. (Hearing record 1879-1908).

   

The antenna heights on the proposed Supertower are low with respect to surrounding residences.

In an effort to reduce the tower’s profile above the mountain ridge line, Lake Cedar Group’s proposed tower was 100 feet shorter than the tallest existing tower. The proposal also located the base of the tower further downhill; about 200 feet lower than the base of the tallest existing tower. The net result is that the top of the proposed tower is about 300 feet lower than the top of the tallest existing tower. The existing Lake Cedar Group antennas are located on the tops of the individual towers. In the new proposal, the antennas are stacked along the length of the tower, further lowering the radiating sources.

Below is a terrain profile showing how the antenna beams, which are angled slightly downward, point directly at residences in nearby neighborhoods to the south.

 
Terrain profile showing how the new SuperTower beams would point directly at residences in nearby south neighborhoods.
Mountsfield Drive, on the peak 1 mile from the proposed tower, already experiences high RF levels and interference, and the contribution from Lake Cedar Group stations would more than double with the Lake Cedar Group proposal.
The Effective Radiated Power of the proposed Lake Cedar Group Supertower would be more than 13 times higher than that of the existing Lake Cedar Group stations on Lookout Mountain.

The current Effective Radiated Power (ERP) of Lake Cedar Group members on Lookout Mountain is 732,000 watts. The proposed ERP would be 9,732,000 watts. This is an increase by a factor of 13.3. In order to actually reduce overall RF levels with its proposal, some other compensating factor or factors would have to be implemented to offset this increase in ERP. As has been shown above, the directional patterns and antenna elevations of the proposal have not provided the required offset to obtain a reduction in RF levels in the surrounding neighborhoods. The RF calculations made by Lake Cedar Group, Jefferson County’s independent expert and CARE engineers confirm this.